北京地区脂蛋白(a)颗粒浓度参考区间的建立
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Establishment of reference interval of particle concentration for detecting lipoprotein (a) in Beijing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 使用两种市售脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]颗粒浓度试剂检测北京地区表观健康人群血清Lp(a)水平,建立北京地区Lp(a)颗粒浓度检测方法的参考区间。 方法 选择2019年11月至2020年8月北京协和医院415例体检健康成年人作为研究对象,其中男215例,女200例,按年龄段16~44岁、45~59岁、60~74岁、75岁及以上分为4组。分别使用迈瑞BS-800全自动生化分析仪和罗氏Cobas 8000全自动生化分析仪及其配套的两种市售Lp(a)颗粒浓度试剂组成的检测系统A和B检测415份血清Lp(a)水平,分别对两种系统进行精密度评价、Passing-Bablok回归分析和Bland-Altman分析方法学比对。根据Lp(a)检测数据类型选择不同的统计学方法,分析性别、年龄因素对血清Lp(a)水平的相关性,以及Lp(a)数据百分位分布。按照美国临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)C28-A3的要求,分别建立A、B两种检测系统的血清Lp(a)参考区间。 结果 A、B两种检测系统的精密度分别为1.3%~1.9%、0.9%~2.0%,回归方程的截距、斜率、医学决定系数(R2)、相关系数(r)分别为-0.013、0.973、0.936、0.967,相关性良好。偏倚图显示两种检测系统的平均偏倚为2.4%,在医学决定水平处的预期偏倚为-2.69%。A、B两种系统血清Lp(a)检测数据均呈非正态分布,中位数(25分位数,75分位数)分别为16.73(8.64,46.52)nmol/L、16.90(8.80,47.40)nmol/L。男性和女性血清Lp(a)水平差异均有统计学意义(A:t=-2.121,P=0.034;B:t=-2.436,P=0.015),男性和女性各自4个年龄段内的血清Lp(a)水平差异均无统计学意义(A:F=2.604,P=0.052;B:F=2.456,P=0.063)。以<第80百分位数计算参考区间,检测系统A的Lp(a)颗粒浓度参考区间为:男(<50 nmol/L)、女(<70 nmol/L)、总(<62 nmol/L);检测系统B的Lp(a)颗粒浓度参考区间为:男(<51 nmol/L)、女(<63 nmol/L)、总(<60 nmol/L)。 结论 初步建立了两种市售Lp(a)颗粒浓度检测试剂的参考区间,血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度水平在男性与女性不同性别组间与厂家说明书提供的参考区间存在差异,应按照不同性别分别建立血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度检测方法的参考区间,作为临床医生对血清Lp(a)实验室水平判断的依据。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective To use two commercially available lipoprotein( a) [ Lp(a)] particle concentration reagents to detect serum Lp(a) levels in apparently healthy population in Beijing, and to establish reference intervals for Lp( a) particle concentration detection methods. Methods A total of 415 healthy adults ( 215 males and 200 females ) with physical examination in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were selected as the research objects during November 2019 and August 2020, they were divided into 4 groups by different gae, respectively 16-44 years old, 45-59 yeas old, 60-74 years old and above 75 years old. The levels of 415 serum Lp(a) were detected by Mindray BS-800 (system A) and Roche Cobas 8000 ( system B) automatic biochemical analyzers and their matching two commercially available Lp(a) particle concentration reagents. Two systems were compared with the precision evaluation, Passing-Bablok regres sion analysis and Bland-Altman analysis method. Analyze the correlation of gender and age factors to the serum Ip(a)levels, and the percentile distribution of Lp( a) data by diferent stistcal methods according to the Lp(a) detection data type. In accordance with the requirements of the Clinical and Iaboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) C28-A3, the serum Lp( a) reference intervals of systems A and B were established respectively. Results The precisions of systems A and B were 1.3%-1.9%,0.9%-2.0%,and the intercept , slope , cofficient of detemination (R2 ), and correlation cofficient (r) of the regression equation were -0.013, 0.973,0.936, 0.967, the corelation is good. The bias graph showed that the average bias of two detection systems was 2.4%,and the expected bias at the medical decision level was - 2.69%. The serum Lp(a) test data of two systems A and B were non-normally distributed,and the median (P2s, P7s) were 16.73 (8.64, 46.52) nmol/L and 16.90 ( 8.80, 47 .40) nmol/L. The difference in serum Lp( a) levels between males and females was stistially signifcant (A: t=-2.121, P=0.034; B: t=-2.436, P=0.015). But the difference within 4 age groups was no statistically significant ( A: F=2.604, P=0.052; B: F=2.456, P=0.063 ). The reference intervals of Lp( a) particle concentration were calculated based on the

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱旭,程歆琦,钟远红.北京地区脂蛋白(a)颗粒浓度参考区间的建立[J].临床检验杂志,2022,40(03):204-208

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-08
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者  苏ICP备12051282号-1
主管单位:江苏省医学会  出版单位:临床检验杂志
单位地址:江苏省南京市中央路42号  邮编:210008
电话:025-83620683 E-MAIL:lcjyzz@163.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司